| 【瑞典】彼得·瓦伦斯滕著.实质和平的条件比较:当代东亚与战后西欧[J].国际安全研究,2015,(4):53-71 |
| 实质和平的条件比较:当代东亚与战后西欧 |
| Comparing Conditions for Quality Peace: Contemporary East Asia v. Post War Western Europe |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 实质和平 领土和平 民主和平 东亚冲突 西欧和平 |
| 英文关键词: quality peace, territorial peace, democratic peace, East Asia,Western Europe |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1582 |
| 全文下载次数: 1135 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在关于国家间战争(或非战争)原因的一般研究中，有两项最重要的论断，即领土争端的重要性以及政权类型的重要意义。前者在文章中的术语表述为“领土和平”假设；后者在一般文献中经常归纳为“民主和平”论题。作者致力于探讨的主要问题是:彼此有过战争历史的国家之间建立“实质和平”，是否以上述两项议题的解决为前提条件。相关结论将用于分析第二次世界大战之后的西欧经验，其后将联系当今东亚形势展开分析。同样，文章还指出其中存在的、具有关键意义的不同之处。其中，东亚区域在向更持久的积极状态迈进时，必须考虑领土主权议题具有的特殊含义，后者构成“实质和平”的关键要素。此时，对于“现实政治”的关注也将加入相关国家的考量与平衡过程之中。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Quality peace means the creation of post war conditions that make the inhabitants of a society (be it an area, a country, a region, a continent, or a planet) secure in life and dignified now and for the foreseeable future.This article deals with two of the strongest conclusions from general studies on the causes as well as absence of interstate war: The importance of territorial disputes and the significance of regime type. The first is termed the “territorial peace” hypothesis; the second is known in the literature as the “democratic peace” proposition. This article discusses if these two issues have to be settled prior to the building of quality peace between states that have a history of war among them. These findings are used to analyze the actual Western European experience since World War II and then relate this to the East Asian situation today. In this way this article also points to important differences. Still, the territorial issues take on particular role if the East Asian region is to move towards more durable and positive conditions, which might constitute ingredients of quality peace. At that moment, Realpolitik concerns also enter the equation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|