| 张发林,姚远.国际金融安全观的演进与评估[J].国际安全研究,2021,(6):28-58 |
| 国际金融安全观的演进与评估 |
| Evolution and Evaluation of the Concept of International Financial Security |
| 投稿时间：2020-08-08 修订日期：2021-03-10 |
| DOI：10.14093/j.cnki.cn10-1132/d.2021.06.002 |
| 中文关键词: 国际金融安全观 国际金融风险 全球金融治理 |
| 英文关键词: international financial security concept, international financial risks, global financial governance |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 834 |
| 全文下载次数: 626 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 国际金融安全是全球化进程中的重要安全议题，也是当前国际秩序转型期全球治理的重要议题。国际金融安全具有主客交融的属性，既涉及物质层面的客观威胁，又涉及观念层面的威胁认知。金融安全研究的三种基本逻辑是权力竞争、利益互动和安全建构。从全球金融治理的视角可以将国际金融安全观界定为核心治理主体对国际金融风险的来源和性质的认知。风险来源和风险性质是国际金融安全观的两个核心内涵，分别对全球金融治理的层级和模式产生重要影响，并由此形成了一个识别国际金融安全观的理论框架。基于这一框架，二战结束以来国际金融安全观的演进主要经历了货币体系安全观、“完美市场”安全观、微观审慎安全观和宏观审慎安全观四个阶段，它们在风险的来源与性质以及治理的层级、逻辑、模式弹性与效力等维度存在较大差异。在当前国际金融体系下，国际社会的金融安全意识在弱化，大国间的金融安全观分歧和竞争正逐渐侵蚀全球金融治理的共识基础，国际金融安全面临的不确定性风险增加。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| International financial security is not only a key security issue in the process of globalization but also a global governance issue in the transition of international order. International financial security contains both objective and subjective elements, which involves objective threats at the material level and subjective fears at the conceptual level. The three basic logics of studies of financial security focus on respectively power competition, interest interaction and security construction. From the perspective of global financial governance, the concept of international financial security can be referred to as the understanding held by the key governance actors of the sources and nature of international financial risks. As the kernel of the international financial security concept, risk sources and their inherent nature exert a significant impact on the hierarchy and mode of global financial governance, and play an important role in the formation of the theoretical framework for identifying international financial security concept. Based on this framework, the conceptual evolution of the international financial security has gone through four main stages that respectively focus on the monetary system security, the “perfect market” security, the micro-prudential security and the macro-prudential security. These concepts differ greatly in terms of the sources and nature of risks as well as such dimensions as hierarchy, logic, resilience and effectiveness of governance. Under the current international financial system, the weaker financial security awareness, the divergence in financial security concepts, and the fierce competition among major countries are eroding the consensus basis of global financial governance, which brings greater uncertainty to the international financial security. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|