| 王明国.国际社会对全球安全倡议的多重认知与中国的推进策略[J].国际安全研究,2023,(3):28-52 |
| 国际社会对全球安全倡议的多重认知与中国的推进策略 |
| The International Community’s Multiple Perceptions of GSI and China’s Promotion Strategies |
| 投稿时间：2023-03-22 修订日期：2023-04-01 |
| DOI：10.14093/j.cnki.cn10-1132/d.2023.03.002 |
| 中文关键词: 全球安全倡议 中国 国际认知 推进方略 乌克兰危机 |
| 英文关键词: Global Security Initiative (GSI), China, international perceptions, promotion strategy, the Ukraine crisis |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1017 |
| 全文下载次数: 1292 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 全球安全倡议是破解全球安全困境的中国方案。全球安全倡议提出后受到国际社会的极大关注，相关分析对于全球安全倡议提出的背景、意图、价值、实施步骤和面临的挑战进行了多方面解读。这些分析认为中国提出倡议的动机主要包括打造新安全秩序论、贡献安全机遇论、提升安全话语论、维护国家安全论及另起炉灶论等。全球安全倡议能够纠正国际安全秩序失衡状况，推动构建国际和地区安全新架构，同时动摇美国对国际安全事务的霸主地位，提升中国的国际安全话语权与地区影响力。当前，国际层面的分析从评估中国提出全球安全倡议的意图转向批判性地评估中国将倡议付诸行动的能力。总体上，国际舆论对全球安全倡议可行性的态度包括积极响应、谨慎乐观、中立观望、质疑担忧和否定抵制五派论调。国际负面认知的原因既有西方地缘政治安全的理论荒谬原因，也有美国追求对抗性权力博弈的实践霸道原因；既有国际倡议被误读的一般原因，又有安全倡议被误读的特殊原因；既有国际社会根深蒂固安全竞争的外部原因，也有倡议作为新理念尚待具体化的内部原因。基于“舆论—回应”机制，中国应理性看待这些负面认知，采取有针对性的应对策略，消除部分国家对全球安全倡议的误解。坚持多方位传播，推动更多国家支持并加入全球安全倡议，打造不可分割的安全共同体，探索中国特色热点问题解决之道。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The Global Security Initiative (GSI) is a Chinese solution to global security dilemmas. The GSI has received enormous attention from the international community since it was put forward. Relevant analyses have made multifaceted interpretations of the background, significance, intentions, implementation steps, and challenges of the GSI. These analyses hold that the motivations behind China’s proposition of the GSI are either to build a new security order, open up more security opportunities, promote security discourse, or safeguard China’s own national security. Undoubtedly, the GSI can correct the imbalance of the international security order, promote the construction of a new international and regional security architecture, weaken the hegemonic position of the United States in international security affairs, and raise China’s voice in international security issues. At present, analyses at the international level have shifted from assessing China’s intentions to launch the GSI to evaluating its ability to put the initiative into action. On the whole, the international public opinions towards the feasibility of the initiative include positive responses, cautiously optimistic outlooks, neutral wait-and-see attitudes, and pessimistic views. The reasons are not only due to the limitations of Western geopolitical security theories as well as the hegemonic practices of the United States. There are both general reasons for the misreadings of international initiatives and special reasons for the misinterpretations of security initiatives. At the same time, there exist both external reasons resulting from deep-rooted security competition in the international community and internal reasons for the GSI to be further concretized. Based on the “public opinion-response” mechanism, China should treat the negative perceptions rationally, adopt targeted response strategies and eliminate people’s misunderstandings about the GSI. More efforts should be made to adhere to multi-directional communication, encourage more countries to join the GSI, create a security community, explore Chinese solutions to hotspot issues, and mitigate interferences from the United States. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|