| 高程,部彦君.失效的“压舱石”：经济安全化的现实转向[J].国际安全研究,2025,(1):133-154 |
| 失效的“压舱石”：经济安全化的现实转向 |
| Failure of the “Ballast Effect”: The Realistic Turn Toward Economic Securitization——A Case Study of Sino-American Trade Conflicts and Russia-European Economic Confrontation |
| 修订日期：2024-11-12 |
| DOI：10.14093/j.cnki.cn10-1132/d.2025.01.007 |
| 中文关键词: 经济安全化 经济压舱石 国家安全 经济相互依赖 |
| 英文关键词: economic securitization, “ballast effect”, national security, economic interdependence |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 210 |
| 全文下载次数: 77 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 经济安全化是国家通过安全叙述将非安全的经济议题转化为安全议题的过程。在国家认为经济合作的收益将损害其在权力竞争中的整体所得时，或者在国家间政治外交关系遇到巨大震荡或冲击时，国家安全逻辑会超越经济逻辑而生效。此时，安全与经济问题在刻意煽动下交织碰撞，国家间密切的经贸关系不仅难以成为管控两国矛盾与分歧的“压舱石”，反而会被国家视作现存的“安全威胁”，成为某些国家中断或破坏双边政治经济联系的借口与手段。国家间存在的经济相互依赖关系也会随之成为安全化操纵国维护与拓展权力、进行地缘政治竞争和打击、操纵他国的战略性工具。因此，文章以存在紧密经济相互依赖的中美与俄欧关系为案例，在比较中美、俄欧之间不同经济安全化动因的基础上，分析经济安全化转向背后的选择逻辑，为中国更好地应对经济安全化挑战、更有针对性地发挥“经济压舱石”作用提供一定思考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Economic securitization is the process by which a state transforms non-security economic issues into security issues through securitization discourse. When a state perceives that the benefits of economic cooperation may harm its overall gains from power competition, or when political and diplomatic relations between states experience significant shocks or disruptions, the logic of national security will override the logic of economics. In this circumstance, close economic and trade relations between states may not serve as a “ballast” that helps manage conflicts and disagreements but instead become a perceived “security threat”, thus providing certain states with excuses or means to limit or sever bilateral political and economic ties. The economic interdependence between states hence is reduced to a strategic tool for the securitizing state to maintain and expand its power, engage in geopolitical competition, weaken or manipulate other states. This paper aims to examine both Sino-American and Russia-European relations that feature closer economic interdependence. By comparing different dynamics in economic securitization behind these relations, this paper analyzes the logic of choice behind the turn toward economic securitization and offers insights into how China can better respond to the challenges of economic securitization and more effectively utilize the “ballast effect” of economic relations. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |