| 余潇枫.共享安全：非传统安全研究的中国视域[J].国际安全研究,2014,(1):4-34 |
| 共享安全：非传统安全研究的中国视域 |
| Shared Security:Chinese Perspectives on Non-traditional Security |
| 投稿时间：2013-08-25 修订日期：2013-10-09 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 非传统安全 共享安全 中国视域 和合主义 |
| 英文关键词: Non-traditional security, shared security, Chinese perspectives, peace cooperationism |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2299 |
| 全文下载次数: 1690 |
| 中文摘要: |
| “共同威胁”与“共患意识”引发人类对非传统安全的普遍关注。非传统安全的价值实质是“共享安全”。共享安全不仅是安全指涉对象的扩展与转型，也是非传统安全理念的提升与非传统安全话语的创新。西方非传统安全理论经由传统安全研究与和平研究的延伸与扩展，形成了建构主义、哥本哈根学派、后结构主义、批判安全理论、人的安全研究、女性主义、后殖民主义等主要流派，其主要价值取向是“建构安全”。然而，共享安全的关键是如何面对与解决人类社会普遍存在的“异质性”冲突，中国的安全观与外交方式的价值类型此有着重大的意义与贡献。中国以“保合太和”、“万国咸宁”、“和而不同”为标志的“和合主义”思想渊源，为共享安全提供了重要的思想内核与独特的价值坐标。中国学者的“新天下主义”、“多种行为主体的共同安全”、“人类共同安全”、“全球深度治理”等对“共建安全”方案的多维度探索，为共享安全提供了极具创意的可能性论证。中国与各国“合作共赢”的外交实践与融入世界的“优态共存”，为共享安全提出了解决现实冲突的重要范例，也为共享安全的可行性提供了无可辩驳的现实逻辑。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| When mankind is faced with a growing number of “common threats”, “a common crisis awareness” has emerged within global community. People begin to recognize the very nature of non-traditional security threats and their impact on the global village, and demand responses in the form of “shared security.” Based on traditional security theories and contributions in the field of peace studies, a constructivist “transitional form” of Western theories has taken shape. The formation of various “independent forms” of non-traditional security theories have subsequently been created, and they all share a common value orientation of “constructed security”.The key to achieving “shared security” is how to deal with “heterogenous” phenomena in international society. China’s security ideal and diplomatic style has been unique compared with the Western world. Chinese concepts, such as “Bao He Tai He”(great harmony are preserved in union), “Wan Guo Xian Ning”(the myriad states all enjoy repose), “He Er Bu Tong”(harmony but not sameness) and “Tian Xia Da Tong”(unity of the world), all embodies rich intellectual resources and the core values for “shared security”. Recently, Chinese scholars have contributed to the growing discourse on “shared security” such as the “New Tian-Xia Doctrine”, “Common security of human being”, “Common security of multi-actors”, and the “Deepening of global governance”. Finally, the author proposes a rethinking of China’s diplomatic practices and argues that “shared security” is not only theoretically valid for non-traditional security but also feasible in practice. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|