| 王菲易,黄胜强.国家安全学中的国门安全研究[J].国际安全研究,2019,(6):52-72 |
| 国家安全学中的国门安全研究 |
| A Research on “National Gateway” Security in National Security Studiess |
| 投稿时间：2019-02-15 修订日期：2019-09-10 |
| DOI：10.14093/j.cnki.cn10-1132/d.2019.06.003 |
| 中文关键词: 国门/口岸 口岸边界 国门安全 学科建设 国家安全学 |
| 英文关键词: national gateway/port of entry, “national gateway” security, discipline construction, national security studies |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 王菲易 | Associate Professor, School of Customs and Public Administration, Shanghai Customs College
Professor, School of Customs and Public Administration, Shanghai Customs College, Ph.D. Supervisor, School of Economics of Shanghai University Shanghai, 201204. | | 黄胜强 | Associate Professor, School of Customs and Public Administration, Shanghai Customs College
Professor, School of Customs and Public Administration, Shanghai Customs College, Ph.D. Supervisor, School of Economics of Shanghai University Shanghai, 201204. |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1235 |
| 全文下载次数: 1549 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 国门是一个抽象的概念，实际上是指口岸管理中的进出境口岸。在全球化和信息化时代，口岸日益成为各国人员、货物(物品)和交通工具进出境的唯一合法通道，口岸的主权性、开放性、国际性和国门安全风险源的多样性共同导致了国门安全风险的流动性、跨境性、复杂性和外溢性。国门安全是国家安全不可分割的重要组成部分，口岸管理是维护国门安全的主要途径。然而，在目前的国家安全学研究中，国门安全仍是一个尚未引起学者关注的重要领域。当下的国门安全研究滞后于进出境监管实践的发展，在响应国家安全战略方面存在不足。随着总体国家安全观的提出、国家安全内涵的拓宽、政府机构改革的推进和进出境监管实践的发展，国家安全学必须不断拓展新的学科方向和研究议题。国家安全学研究不能仅仅关注单个领域的国门安全问题，而必须基于国家安全的空间场域来凝练国门安全的研究议题，并使国家安全学研究朝着巩固研究领域、促进学科构建的方向发展。植根于维护国门安全的现实需求和完善国家安全学学科体系的理论需要的国门安全学，应当成为国家安全学的重要组成部分。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In this article, “national gateway” generally refers to the ports of entry in port management. In the age of globalization and information, ports of entry have increasingly become the only legitimate channel for people, goods (articles) and vehicles to enter or leave a country. The sovereign nature of the ports with a high level of openness and international character, along with the divergent risk sources, have made ports of entry high-risk areas beset by a complex set of border-crossing risks that might lead to spillover effects. The “national gateway” security is an integral part of national security and port management is a main pathway to safeguard “national gateway” security. However, the “national gateway” security studies have not received enough attention from scholars specialized in national security studies. Lagging far behind the development of inbound and outbound supervision practices, researches on “national gateway” security should be further facilitated to respond well to national security strategies. It is imperative for national security studies to constantly expand new disciplinary orientations and research topics so as to fit in well with the advancement of the overall national security concept, the broadening of the national security scope, the promotion of the reform of government agencies and the improvement of inbound/outbound supervision practices. National security studies should not only focus on specific “national gateway” security problems in separate fields, but also put emphasis on concrete research topics concerning “national gateway” security under the framework of national security, thus promoting the development of national security studies by contributing to its disciplinary construction. “National gateway” security studies that has the potential to meet the realistic needs of safeguarding “national gateway” security and the theoretical needs of improving the disciplinary system of national security studies should be incorporated into national security studies as a key component. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|