| 华敏超,陈晨.“全球南方”参与全球安全治理：共识和分歧[J].国际安全研究,2026,(3):133-156 |
| “全球南方”参与全球安全治理：共识和分歧 |
| The Global South and Global Security Governance: Consensus and Divergence |
| 修订日期：2025-12-22 |
| DOI：10.14093/j.cnki.cn10-1132/d.2026.03.006 |
| 中文关键词: 全球南方 全球安全治理 治理共识 治理分歧 |
| 英文关键词: Global South, global security governance, governance consensus, governance divergences |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 641 |
| 全文下载次数: 130 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 基于“安全状态—安全能力”的二元分析框架，文章系统探讨了全球南方国家参与全球安全治理的共识与分歧。研究显示，“全球南方”在客观安全状态上面临共同挑战，包括主权独立受威胁、经济自主性不足及安全话语权缺失；在主观安全治理层面形成以多边主义与共同安全为核心的理念共识，主张改革治理结构并坚持以发展为导向；在安全能力建设上致力于推进制度整合、资源统筹与规范塑造。然而，“全球南方”内部在身份定位与治理目标上存在安全治理取向的分化，在安全议题选择与安全发展偏好上呈现差异，在行动路径的选择上存在嵌入性改革、平行性建制与区域化安全等模式。为应对这些复杂态势，应构建分层对接与功能互补的安全架构以尊重差异化诉求，创新议题联动与资源整合机制以协调多样化偏好，促进多元路径的协同增效以包容差异化行动选择，并聚焦安全能力建设以夯实“全球南方”的安全基础，从而为推动全球安全治理体系向更加公平、包容、可持续的方向转型提供理论参考与实践路径。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on the dual analytical framework of “security status–security capacity,” this article systematically examines points of consensus and divergence among Global South countries in their participation in global security governance. The findings reveal that, in terms of objective security status, the Global South confronts common challenges, including threats to sovereign independence, inadequate economic autonomy, and deficient discursive influence in security affairs. In terms of subjective perceptions of security governance, the Global South has forged a conceptual consensus centered on multilateralism and common security, advocating structural reforms of the global governance system while upholding a development-oriented approach. In the field of security capacity building, efforts are directed toward institutional integration, resource coordination, and norm development. However, within the Global South, there exist divergent orientations regarding identity construction and governance objectives, differences in the selection of security issues and development preferences, and varying modes of action, including embedded reform, parallel institution-building, and regionalized security approaches. To address these complex dynamics, the authors propose constructing a security architecture featuring hierarchical alignment and functional complementarity to meet differentiated demands, innovating mechanisms of issue linkage and resource integration to reconcile diverse preferences, promoting synergy among multiple pathways to accommodate varied action choices, and focusing on security capacity building to solidify the security foundations of the Global South. These efforts aim to provide theoretical insights and practical pathways for advancing the transformation of the global security governance system toward a more equitable, inclusive, and sustainable transformation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|