| 李俊清,胡延龙.于大变局中开新局：以共同体建设推动构建高水平安全新格局[J].国际安全研究,2026,(4):3-31 |
| 于大变局中开新局：以共同体建设推动构建高水平安全新格局 |
| Forging a New Path amid Great Changes: Advancing a New Architecture of High-Level Security Through Community Building |
| 修订日期：2026-05-28 |
| DOI：10.14093/j.cnki.cn10-1132/d.2026.04.001#$TAB |
| 中文关键词: 大变局 共同体建设 高水平安全 新安全格局 安全治理 |
| 英文关键词: great changes unseen in a century, community building, high-level security, new security architecture, security governance |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 219 |
| 全文下载次数: 119 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 百年未有之大变局加速演进，传统安全与非传统安全深度交织，现行安全治理体系面临规则碎片化、多边协调效能不足的深层结构性矛盾，治理赤字持续扩大。在此背景下，构建高水平安全新格局是应对变局的时代课题，其核心路径是通过共同体建设，以共享认同替代权力均衡、以共生价值超越零和博弈，推动安全从对立互斥的国家私产转向互构包容的公共产品，完成安全价值逻辑的根本转换。“三个共同体”构成“内稳底盘、中筑屏障、外拓空间”圈层化安全架构，与高水平安全格局之间形成价值目标阶梯式同构、结构层级立体互嵌及发展安全双向互融的逻辑关联。其所面临的认同非均衡、机制碎片化、安全共生脆弱、治理能力不足四重挑战映射理念、制度、利益、能力的结构性短板。基于此，从理念引领、制度供给、利益联结、能力支撑四个维度提出构建高水平安全新格局的实践路径，为以共同体建设的确定性对冲外部环境的不确定性、在变局中构建高水平安全新格局提供系统性学理支撑。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The great changes unseen in a century are accelerating, with traditional and non-traditional security threats deeply intertwined and mutually reinforcing. The existing security governance system is confronting deep-seated structural challenges stemming from regulatory disorder and weak coordination. Against this background, advancing a new architecture of high-level security has become a core proposition for responding to the transformations of the era. The core breakthrough of “community building” lies in replacing power balancing with shared identity, transcending zero-sum thinking through symbiotic values, transforming the relationship between “self-security” and “other-security” from opposition to mutual constitution, and turning security from an exclusive national asset into an inclusive public good, thereby achieving a fundamental shift in the logic of security values. The “Three Communities” constitute a layered security pattern designed to “stabilize the internal foundation, strengthen the intermediate buffer, and expand the external space.” This pattern aligns logically with the new architecture of high-level security through the stepwise isomorphism of value objectives, the three-dimensional nesting of structural levels, and the two-way integration of development and security. The four challenges it faces—unbalanced identity, fragmented mechanisms, fragile security symbiosis, and insufficient governance capacity—reflect structural weaknesses in concepts, institutions, interests, and capabilities. To address these challenges, this paper proposes practical pathways for constructing a new architecture of high-level security across four dimensions: conceptual guidance, institutional supply, interest linkage, and capacity support, thereby providing systematic theoretical support for mitigating external uncertainty through the stabilizing effects of community building and for advancing a new architecture of high-level security amid great changes. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|