Page 156 - 《国际安全研究》2022年第6期
P. 156

Journal of International Security Studies
            enhance strategic mutual  trust, preserve global peace and strategic stability, and
            safeguard the common well-being of human society.
            [Keywords] US nuclear policy, “no first  use”, nuclear weapons, policy proposal,
            major resistance factors
            [Author] LU Yin, Associate Professor, National Security College, National Defense
            University (Beijing, 100091).


       113   Beyond Biodefense: “Dual-Use” Security Narrative and Evolution
            of US Biotechnology Policies
            DING Di

            [Abstract] Biotechnology has been both a tremendous catalyst and a potential risk for
            the advancement of human society due to  its  “dual-use” nature. Ever since 9/11
            terrorist attacks, the US government has been working on its discourse manipulation
            of the “dual-use” concept in the field of biotechnology, which not only contributed to
            the final formation of a unique security narrative, but also accelerated the evolution
            of US biotechnology policies. From the Bush administration  to the Biden
            administration, biotechnology under the “dual-use” security narrative has generated
            multiple security effects and developed both defensive and competitive objectives in
            the field of biotechnology policies. Theoretically, there is an obvious contradiction
            between the defensive and competitive objectives,  which highlights the fact  that
            Washington’s  hegemonic logic  has  eroded  its  rational  policy making against  the
            backdrop of great power competition. Practically, US biotechnology policies have
            gone beyond its biodefense strategy with an attempt to “decouple” scientific research
            from that of America’s competitors and strengthen militarized investment so as to
            suppress America’s competitors and maintain its leading position in biotechnology.
            As is  known to all, the development  of emerging  biotechnology  contributes  to
            globalization  and benefits all  humanity.  The policies and  actions based on  US
            hegemonic logic is against the law of science and technology development, and may
            “backfire” and exert  severe and negative impacts on  the  development  of US
            biotechnology itself as well as global biosecurity.
            [Keywords] biosecurity, security narratives, US hegemony, dual use, biotechnology
            [Author] DING  Di, Associate Researcher, Institute for China and  World Studies,
            Tongji University; Ph.D. Student, School of Political Science and International
            Relations, Tongji University (Shanghai, 200092).

                                                    (本期英文编辑:张国帅  高  静)










            · 154 ·
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161