Page 159 - 《国际安全研究)》2020年第2期
P. 159

Vo1. 38, No. 2, March/April 2020
               is increasing. China-US economic and trade frictions have indicated that economic
               and trade cooperation, the traditional cornerstone of bilateral ties, can just play a
               limited role in handling the “new situation” of strategic competition. To effectively
               prevent the “new situation” from  escalating into full-scale  confrontations and
               conflicts, it is imperative  for the two countries to explore a “new paradigm” that
               helps redefine their roles, handle and control their bilateral relationship. The global
               governance structure with global security  governance as an essential part of it,
               provides a relatively stable institutional system for China-US strategic gaming and
               balance of power. By clarifying the boundaries of strategic competition, constructing
               a platform for dialogue and coordination, and effectively drawing support from third
               parties, China and the US can proactively facilitate rational competition and
               constructive cooperation, which will directly bring about changes to the concepts,
               systems and models of global security governance. Such endeavors are not only in
               line with the fundamental interests of both sides and the universal aspirations of the
               international community, but also fit in with the particular needs of the development
               of sound global governance. A  major issue, however, stands in the way of
               establishing the “new paradigm”: a new “cornerstone” should be explored in view of
               the unstable role played  by economic and trade cooperation and the insufficient
               cooperation over global security governance.  In the future, given that strategic
               competition features in the China-US relations, a new “cornerstone” can be forged
               by achieving the balance of  power between the two great powers through the
               establishment of a relatively stable mechanism via power gaming.
               [Keywords]  China-US  relations,  great-power competition, new paradigm, global
               security governance
               [Authors]    AN Gang, Research Fellow at the Center for  International Strategy and
               Security of Tsinghua University and Editor of World Affairs (Beijing, 100020); WANG
               Yiming, Ph.D. Student at the  School  of International Studies, Renmin University  of
               China (Beijing, 100872); HU Xin, Associate Professor at the Institute of Strategy and
               Security Studies,  College  of  International Studies, National University  of Defense
               Technology (Nanjing, 210039).

          49   An Analysis of the Relationship between the INF Treaty and Global
               Strategic Stability
               GUO Xiaobing and LONG Yun
               [Abstract]    The INF Treaty, an important arms control treaty reached by the United
               States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, served as one of the major pillars
               of global strategic stability. In August 2019, the United States and Russia withdrew
               from the INF Treaty  one after another, arousing great concerns from the
               international community. The misgivings are that their withdrawal from the treaty
               will affect global strategic stability and security situations in  Europe and  Asia,
               trigger a new round of  arms race and undermine the international arms control
               system. China has been taken by the United States as an important excuse for its
               withdrawal, so the  demise of the treaty is bound to exert a  profound impact on
               China’s external security  environment. This paper intends to review the creation,
               development and termination of the INF Treaty, analyze its evolutionary causes on
               the international, domestic and personal levels and concludes that changes in the
               international landscape have played a decisive role in making the treaty rise and fall.
               In the 1980s, changes in the balance of power between the Soviet Union and the
               United States led to the birth of the INF Treaty. In the 21st centurary, pressures from
               NATO and the proliferation of missile technology prompted Russia to launch the
               initiative to globalize the INF Treaty. In recent years, the relative decline of the US
               hegemonic position has created the environment for the US to opt out of the INF
               Treaty. At the same time, domestic politics and leadership changes in the United
               States and Russia have also exerted profound influence on the timing and mode of

                                                                                    · 157 ·
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164