Page 159 - 《国际安全研究》2021年第1期
P. 159

Vo1. 39 No. 1, January/February 2021
               [Keywords]   Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Mechanism, non-traditional security,
               security governance, fragmentation model, platform model
               [Author]   LI Zhifei, Associate Research Fellow, Ph.D., National Institute of
               International Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (Beijing, 100007).

         120   Making the Best of New Opportunities: The ASEAN Path to Resolving
               Non-traditional Security Dilemma
               FAN Jiarui
               [Abstract]    Is there a non-traditional  security dilemma? Why  does this security
               dilemma arise? Can the ASEAN-centered regional cooperation in East Asia resolve
               it? Previous studies tend to divide States’ behavioral logic into traditional and
               non-traditional security  perspectives, explaining  the former  with the security
               dilemma theory whereas interpreting the latter via the lenses of securitization and
               peace-cooperativism with the belief that the latter is easier to lead to international
               cooperation.  The COVID-19 pandemic is a typical non-traditional security crisis.
               However, countries of the world have failed to jointly confront the pandemic,
               witnessing aggravated confrontation rather  than effective cooperation. This  paper
               regards  this anomalous  case as a  non-traditional security dilemma  and views the
               uncertain policies and behavioral intentions of different countries as its main cause.
               After the Cold War, the ASEAN-centered regional cooperation framework has made
               the best of any opportunities when handling non-traditional security issues.
               Therefore, it has helped enhance common understanding  of  security threats,
               consolidate common interests by virtue of the existing regional cooperation regime
               and establish a “threat-interest” transformation mechanism to increase the certainty
               of policies and behavioral intentions. All of the efforts have contributed to possible
               resolutions to non-traditional security dilemmas.  This paper  cites the Special
               ASEAN, China, Japan and ROK (ASEAN plus Three) Summit on COVID-19
               Response convened on April 24, 2020 as an example. Although the consensus on
               security interests  among the above-mentioned countries still needs to be
               strengthened, a common understanding of security threats has been formed, which
               can be perceived as a positive regional manifestation of how to resolve the current
               global non-traditional security dilemma against the backdrop of COVID-19.
               [Keywords]   non-traditional security  dilemma, uncertainty, COVID-19, ASEAN
               path
               [Author]    FAN Jiarui, Ph.D. Candidate at School of International Studies, Peking
               University (Beijing, 100871).

                                                          (本期英文编辑:张国帅 高静)







                                                                                    · 157 ·
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164