Page 157 - 《国际安全研究》2021年第1期
P. 157

Vo1. 39 No. 1, January/February 2021
               politico-security order through their voting choices in the UN Security Council. The
               combination of text analysis and  action observation may provide a  more
               comprehensive understanding of the views of the two countries. By no means shall
               China and Russia be viewed as “revisionist countries” as both of them advocate
               maintaining the stability of the UN-centered international politico-security order,
               promoting the development of a multi-polarized order in a more fair and reasonable
               direction, safeguarding international fairness and justice, opposing arms races and
               the militarization of outer space, as well as fighting against hegemonism and power
               politics. At the same time, it should be noted that the two countries differ in their
               understandings of multi-polarization, means to maintain international political
               security, the  Eurasian regional order and non-traditional security. They have  also
               demonstrated different degrees of respect for the UN-centered international security
               system. Comparatively speaking, China has displayed more consistency between its
               words (statements on international politico-security order) and deeds (behaviors in
               maintaining that order).
               [Keywords]  international order, international politico-security order, Sino-Russian
               relations, UN system
               [Author]    LEI Jianfeng, Associate Professor, Department  of Diplomacy,  China
               Foreign Affairs University (Beijing, 100037).

          63   Lancang-Mekong Water Resources Security and Water Cooperation:
               From a Development-oriented Perspective
               TU Su
               [Abstract]    Since the beginning of the 21st century, water and related resources in
               Lancang-Mekong basin  have been subject to mounting pressure due to the
               population  growth, rapid economic development and urbanization. The
               uncoordinated development of Mekong water resources by the riparian countries and
               the frequent occurrence of extreme weather events brought about by climate change
               have caused  devastating impacts on the Lancang-Mekong basin  facing increased
               risks to water security. Currently, water security  of this region is witnessing a
               medium-level vulnerability  that will  be further exacerbated by  the cumulative
               environmental effects caused by the completed and ongoing projects as well as the
               possible upcoming ones. In order to safeguard water security, all the Mekong river
               countries have expressed their hope for greater consultation,  coordination and
               cooperation on water resources issues among themselves and with China, the most
               upstream country of the Mekong river. From the  highest to lowest ranking, their
               water security needs are: flood control, water supply, ecological security  and
               water-food-energy security. While the four basic security needs coexisting with each
               other, they occupy the dominant status at different stages of the social and economic
               development of  these countries. Given that the Lancang-Mekong water security
               cooperation  should meet different needs  for water security  while taking into


                                                                                    · 155 ·
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162