Page 159 - 《国际安全研究》2021年第5期
P. 159

Vo1. 39, No.  5, September/October  2021



                                           Abstract






            3   Beyond Assured Destruction:  Quantity of Nuclear Weapons,
               Commitment Credibility and Rationale of Nuclear Deterrence

               YANG Yuan

               [Abstract] Almost all the existing studies on theories and policies concerning nuclear
               deterrence tend to believe that whether the number of nuclear weapons reaches the
               threshold of assured destruction has a decisive impact on the effectiveness of nuclear
               deterrence. The impact of this “assured destruction” principle in the academic circle
               has reached a paradigm level so that scholars incline to expound their claims based
               on this principle when debating the policy issue of whether China’s nuclear weapons
               are  sufficient or not.  This paper argues  that  the “assured destruction” paradigm
               neglects the crucial role of commitment  credibility in the nuclear deterrence
               effectiveness and  fails to realize the reverse impact  of changes in  the number of
               nuclear weapons on  commitment credibility as well  as  on  the mechanism
               effectiveness of nuclear deterrence, which leads to a misconception that the capacity
               for “assured destruction” should be regarded as  the sole criterion for  judging
               whether nuclear deterrence is effective or not. By analyzing the interactive relations
               between the number of nuclear weapons, commitment credibility and the
               effectiveness of nuclear deterrence, this paper points out that “assured destruction”
               is neither a sufficient nor a necessary condition for nuclear deterrence to be effective.
               It is totally possible to achieve effective nuclear deterrence without increasing the
               number of nuclear weapons when the threshold of “assured destruction” hasn’t been
               reached. Instead, the number of nuclear weapons should (continue to) be increased
               after the threshold has been reached in order to further ensure effective deterrence.
               Going beyond the “assured destruction” paradigm is conducive to a more accurate
               and comprehensive understanding of the entire mechanism for the effectiveness of
               nuclear deterrence.
               [Keywords] nuclear brinkmanship, nuclear deterrence, nuclear strategy, assured
               destruction, strategic stability
               [Author] YANG  Yuan, Associate Professor, School of International Relations,
               University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; Associate Research Fellow,
               Institute of  World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
               (Beijing, 100720).


                                                                                    · 157 ·
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164