Page 161 - 《国际安全研究》2021年第2期
P. 161

Vo1. 39, No. 2, March/April 2021
               deterrence, the United States has been seeking to weaken China’s nuclear retaliation
               capability and disrupt the asymmetric nuclear stability between the two countries. In
               order to break the stalemate, China needs to step up efforts to improve the quality of
               its nuclear weapons, enhance the effectiveness of deterrence signaling, dispel the US
               strategic opportunistic mentality with reliable nuclear deterrence and counterattack
               capacities,  maintain strategic stability between the  two countries, especially crisis
               stability, and build a firm foundation for containing the outbreak of war.
               [Keywords] nuclear weapons, strategic stability,  asymmetric  stability, nuclear
               retaliation capability, strategic opportunism
               [Author] HU Gaochen, Postdoctoral Student and Assistant Research Fellow, School
               of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University (Beijing, 100084).

           86   Japan’s China Policy under Abe Administration: From Strategic
               Balancing to Tactical Hedging
               CHEUNG Mong

               [Abstract] Japan’s diplomacy with China under the second Abe administration has
               been greatly influenced  by the international situation and the US-China-Japan
               strategic triangle. This article argues that Japan, as a secondary power, has  been
               shifting its China policy from “strategic balancing” to “tactical hedging” since 2017,
               and is adopting a mixed strategy that intends to search for a THIRD strategic choice
               between the United States and China. Before 2017, Japan adopted a strategic
               balancing approach by promoting “Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement” (TPP)
               with the United States, consolidating Self-Defense Forces (SDF) capability on island
               defense, and downplaying China’s “Belt and Road Initiative”. After 2017, given the
               uncertainty revealed in the US-China relations, Japan has adopted a tactical hedging
               approach by promoting the openness of the “Indo-Pacific Initiative” and China-Japan
               top leader summit, further consolidating defense capability, and demonstrating a
               partially positive attitude  towards China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The author
               thinks that, in the Reiwa Era, Japan will rise to be a Middle Power with increased,
               while limited, strategic autonomy and is likely to engage with China more deliberately
               within the framework of Japan–US alliance.
               [Keywords] balancing, hedging, Sino-Japanese relations, Japan’s foreign policy,
               China- US-Japan strategic triangle
               [Author] CHEUNG Mong, Ph.D., Associate Professor, International Liberal Studies
               (SILS), Waseda University, Japan.

         107   Alliance Dilemma, Rational Choice and the Limited Upgrading of
               Australia-US Alliance
               XU Shanpin and ZHANG Tao

               [Abstract] In any alliance, there exists an alliance dilemma featuring “abandonment”
               and “entrapment”. Australia’s subordinate position in the Australia-US alliance also
               creates a dilemma for it to face. Australia fears  “abandonment” if it highlights
               strategic autonomy and dreads “entrapment”  if it further consolidates its alliance
               with the United States. After assessing and weighing the international and regional
               situations such as the rapid rise of China, the strategic contraction of the United

                                                                                    · 159 ·
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164