Page 159 - 《国际安全研究》2022年第1期
P. 159

Vo1.  40,  No.  1,  January/February  2022
               and  Director  of  Center  for  Non-traditional  Security  &  Peaceful  Development,
               Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, 310058).

           73   Securitization Practices and Strategic Adjustments in U.S. Policy on

               Global Supply Chain
               GUAN Chuanjing
               [Abstract]  Since  President  Biden  took  office  in  2021,  a series  of  new policies  on
               supply chain have been initiated by the new administration that include strengthening
               domestic  industrial  build-up  on  the  pretext  of  “national  security”,  supporting
               advanced  manufacturing  activities,  advancing  emerging  technology  research  and
               development and developing an international supply chain with its security allies in
               key  industries.  In  contrast  to  the  Trump  administration,  the  Biden  administration
               further underlines the principle of paying equal attention to economic security and
               state  security.  As  regards  the  nature  of  this  important  policy  change,  relevant
               researches have presented two different pictures: a strategic one and a functional one.
               This paper tends to adopt the securitization of economic policies as the analysis path
               to investigate the security effects of the global supply chain, clarify the types of the
               economy-security  nexus,  and  further  reveal  the  generation  mechanism  of  “hybrid
               securitization practices” in the U.S. new supply chain policy. Viewed from the policy
               implementation standpoint, such securitization practices have taken on two distinctly
               new features. First, security of the supply chain has been given equal attention with
               the  strategic  competition  among  major  countries  under  the  impact  of  COVID-19
               pandemic. Second, efforts have been made to rebuild the industrial chain via domestic
               investment and forge a networked supply chain in key industries so as to exercise
               economic power over its strategic rivals. While the new policies are constrained by
               the tensions between market forces and long-term strategic interests, they are bound
               to  bring  more  uncertainties  to  the  recovery  of  the  global  economy  in  the  post-
               pandemic era.
               [Keywords] securitization operation, the Biden administration, global supply chain,
               supply chain security, economic power
               [Author] GUAN Chuanjing, Associate Professor, School of International Relations,
               University of International Business and Economics (Beijing, 100029).

          100   The  Theoretical  Logics  and  Implementation  Paths  of  the  U.S.

               Adjustment of Its Global Supply Chain
               LI Shujun and WANG Xiaoming
               [Abstract] National security has been playing an increasingly important role in the
               U.S. adjustment of its global supply chain ever since the Obama administration and
               especially after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Viewed from the
               perspective of national security, the logical basis and implementation pathway for the
               U.S. adjustment of its global supply chain are mainly revealed in the following fact.
               U.S. national security puts a high premium on the values of national interests, whereas
               the  adjustment  of  its  global  supply  chain  attaches  great  importance  to  the
               replaceability of products or services. Therefore, the “National Defense Argument”
               featuring trade protectionism and “selective trade protectionism” serve, in this paper,
               as the theoretical framework for analyzing the U.S. adjustment of its global supply
               chain. The “National Defense Argument” advocates restricting or prohibiting import
               and export of products or services with national defense significance while “selective
               trade protectionism” focuses on the damages done by general trade practices to the

                                                                                    · 157 ·
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164