Page 160 - 《国际安全研究》2023年第1期
P. 160

Journal of  International Security Studies
            globalization to security globalization with the possibility of further collapsing into a
            “global security dilemma”. The policies of some major countries began to change
            from focusing on the globalization-driven economic growth to emphasizing national
            security factors at the expense of economic efficiency. This  prevailing trend is
            featured by more distrust in openness and market, mounting strategic competition,
            securitization  of  supply  chain  and  payment  network,  and increased  military
            investment and deployment. The fundamental way to save globalization is to place
            the world economy back to a relatively high growth trajectory through technological
            progress driven by breakthrough innovations, and restore relations between
            countries from a “zero-sum game” to a “win-win situation”. Frontier or peripheral
            regions enjoy favorable conditions for breaking free from conventions and achieving
            breakthroughs in institutional and technological innovations,  but their particular
            vulnerabilities still persist. Countries should not only launch stimulus policies to
            promote innovation in frontier regions, but also strengthen monitoring and
            evaluation of the impacts exerted by  both hard and soft power on them.  While
            making good use of international and  domestic markets and resources, countries
            should make great efforts to attract talents and investments, continue to enhance the
            centripetal  force  in  frontier  regions,  and  create  a  favorable  social  environment
            featuring  stability  and  solidarity  to  bring  into full  play  their  potentials for
            breakthrough innovations.
            [Keywords]  security globalization, security dilemma, competition under the  same
            rules, competition under different rules
            [Author] FENG Weijiang, Professor, University of Chinese  Academy of Social
            Sciences  (UCASS);  Senior  Fellow,  Institute  of  World  Economics  and  Politics,
            Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (IWEP-CASS) (Beijing, 100732).

        75   Lens  of Security: Process  and Mechanism of  Science  and
            Technology in Security Issues
            YANG Na and CHENG Hongyi

            [Abstract] Competition and cooperation in the field of science and technology have
            increasingly become one of the core components of interactions between countries.
            They are also regarded as key  variables that affect international comparison of
            national strength, security environment and countries’ external behaviors. The
            efforts made by major countries to promote sci-tech development and maintain
            competitive edge in science and technology has significantly enhanced the position
            of scientific and technological elements in security issues. If science and technology
            are considered as “lens of security” that exist in various fields, interactions between
            different actors in relation to security and the  development of science and
            technology can be defined in accordance with the sharing degree of such two
            elements as resources and knowledge. Then, an overall framework can be developed
            to take into account the overall developmental characteristics of science and
            technology, and  specific  interactions  in various fields. Within the framework,
            confrontation or competition between actors may arise or cooperation featured by

            ·  158  ·
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164