Page 69 - 《国际安全研究》2021年第2期
P. 69

2021 年第 2 期

                   还有美国学者认为中国的战略武器具备威慑实力。他们提出,中国核武器的生
                                               ①
               存能力确保了核报复能力足够有效;  确保二次打击的报复能力是中国威慑战略的
               目标,随着中国核武器的机动性、隐蔽性等生存能力的增强,尤其是公路机动弹道

                                                                      ②
               导弹的部署,中国只需要少量核武器即可达到这一战略目标;   中国加速部署的新
                                                        ③
               一代公路机动弹道导弹,实现了可信的威慑。   还有学者认为中国具备海基核报复
                     ④
               能力,   提出中国海基核威慑力量的生存能力不断提高,促使美国不得不考虑接受
                                      ⑤
               与中国的相互脆弱关系。
                   美国国内也存在反对上述观点的声音,反对观点呈现出从较为明确的否认向
               回避态度的转变。早年的研究成果从中国洲际弹道导弹的发射准备时间长、战略

                  ①  Christopher Bolkcom, Shirley  A. Kan and  Amy F. Woolf,  U.S. Conventional Forces and
               Nuclear Deterrence: A China Case Study, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress Order
               Code RL33607, August 11, 2006, https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9510/m1/1/high_res
               _d/RL33607_2006Aug11.pdf; Robert A. Manning, “The Future of U.S. Extended Deterrence in Asia to
               2025,” Atlantic Council Brent Scowcroft Center On International Security, October 2014,
               https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Future_US_Ext_Det_in_Asia.pdf.
                  ②  M. Taylor Fravel  and Evan  S. Medeiros,  “China’s Search for Assured Retaliation: The
               Evolution of Chinese Nuclear Strategy and Force Structure,” International Security, Vol. 35, No. 2,
               2010, pp. 48-87; Fiona S. Cunningham and M. Taylor Fravel, “Assuring Assured Retaliation: China’s
               Nuclear Posture and U.S.-China Strategic Stability,” International Security, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2015, pp.
               7-50.
                  ③ James Mulvenon, “Chinese  and Mutually Assured Destruction: Is China Getting MAD?”
               Chapter 8, in Henry D. Sokolski, ed., Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Origins
               and Practice, Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College, 2004, pp. 239-259, https://www.
               questia.com/read/110525419/getting-mad-a-nuclear-mutual-assured-destruction.
                  ④  Jesse L. Karotkin, “Trends in China’s Naval Modernization: US-China Economic and Security
               Review Commission Testimony,” Appendix A. 2014 ONI Testimony on China’s Navy, Hearing Before
               the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission on China’s Military Modernization and Its
               Implications for the United States, January 30, 2014; Ronald O’Rourke, “China Naval Modernization:
               Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research
               Service, September 21, 2015, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL3315; Thomas M.
               Skypek,  China’s Sea-Based Nuclear Deterrent in 2020:  Four  Alternative  Futures for China’s SSBN
               Fleet, in Collection of Papers from the 2010 Nuclear Scholars Initiative, Washington D.C., Center for
               Strategic and International Studies, 2010, pp. 105-121, https://www.andrewerickson.com/2011/10/
               chinas-sea-based-nuclear-deterrent-in-2020-four-alternative-futures-for-chinas-ssbn-fleet/; James R.
               Holmes and Toshi Yoshimara,  “China’s New Undersea Nuclear Deterrent Strategy, Doctrine, and
               Capabilities,” Joint Forces Quarterly, Issue 50, 2008, pp. 31-38.
                  ⑤ Christian Conroy, “China’s Ballistic-Missile Submarines: How Dangerous?”  The National
               Interest, November 18, 2013, http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/chinas-ballistic-missile-submarines-
               how-dangerous-9414.
                                                                                     · 67 ·
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74