Page 134 - 《国际安全研究》2021年第5期
P. 134

发展—安全互动演进的区域逻辑:以湄公河下游区域为例

                 发展区域主义即发展导向(development-led  regionalism)的区域主义,其目
            标是最大限度地发挥区域合作的效益,推动成员国经济更有优势地融入世界市
            场,进而实现经济、社会和人的可持续发展。   因而,发展区域主义可以是一个
                                                       ①
            很大的范畴,它可以包含广泛的合作领域,既包括经济一体化,也包括各种形式
                             ②
            的多边发展合作。   为了同传统的经济区域主义相区别,发展区域主义也会被用
            来专指以区域发展为目标的多边经济发展合作,这些发展合作主要针对发展中国

            家或区域,或以特定的经济社会发展(而非政治—安全)为目标。前者可以被视为
            广义的发展区域主义,后者则是狭义的发展区域主义。   经济一体化的强劲力量在
                                                              ③

                ①  UNCTAD, The Least Developed Countries Report 2011: The Potential Role of South-South
            Cooperation for Inclusive and  Sustainable Development, New York and Geneva: Union Nations
            Publication, 2011, p. 100.
                ②  “Shift from  Traditional  Approach to  Integration to ‘Developmental  Regionalism’,” report
            urges, UNCTAD  Press  Release,  2013, https://unctad.org/press-material/shift-traditional-approach-
            integration-developmental-regionalism-report-urges.
                ③  广义的发展区域主义概念应用在宏观理论和政策层面,强调发展区域主义议程的包容性。
            包括赫特纳等人和联合国贸易和发展会议(United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,
            UNCTAD)出版的报告,都将发展区域主义定义为一种包含经济、社会、环境等部门要素的宽
            泛领域,而在具体的发展区域主义案例研究中,发展区域主义更多专指在特定领域展开的发展合
            作和交通、环境、水等区域公共产品的联合管理方面的合作实践。为了避免研究的泛化,我们使
            用狭义的发展区域主义概念,即将发展区域主义理解为以经济为导向的各种发展合作活动。前者
            参考 Björn Hettne and Frederik Söderbaum. “The New Regionalism Approach,” Politeia, Vol. 17, No 3,
            1998, pp. 6-21; Björn Hettne, András Inotai and Osvaldo Sunkel, Globalism and the New Regionalism,
            London:  Palgrave Macmillan, 1999; Frederik Söderbaum and Timothy M. Shaw,  Theories of New
            Regionalism,  London: Palgrave  Macmillan,  2003; Björn Hettne, “Beyond the ‘New’ Regionalism,”
            New Political Economy, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2005, pp. 543-571; UNCTAD, The Least Developed Countries
            Report 2011: The  Potential Role of  South–South Cooperation for Inclusive and  Sustainable
            Development, pp.  100-102。后者相关概念的文献包括:S.  K. B.  Asante, Regionalism and Africa’s
            Development: Expectations, Reality and Challenges, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999; Helen E. S.
            Nesadurai, “Attempting Developmental Regionalism through  AFTA: The Domestic Sources of
            Regional Governance,” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2003, pp. 235-253; David J. Francis,
            “Linking Peace, Security and Developmental Regionalism: Regional Economic and Security
            Integration in  Africa,”  Journal  of Peacebuilding  & Development,  Vol.  2,  No.  3, 2006,  pp.  7-20;
            Christopher M. Dent, “The Asian Development Bank and Developmental Regionalism in East Asia,”
            Third World Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2008, pp. 767-786; Christopher M. Dent and  Peter Richter,
            “Sub-Regional Cooperation and Developmental Regionalism: The Case of BIMP-EAGA,”
            Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 33,  No.  1, 2011, pp.  29-55; Adonis L. Elumbre, “Interpreting
            ASEAN Developmental Regionalism through  Discursive Institutionalism,”  Journal of Third World
            Studies, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2014, pp. 75-108; Said Adejumobi and Cyril Obi, Developmental Regionalism
            and Economic Transformation in Southern Africa, London: Routledge, 2020。

            · 132   ·
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139